So far as I’m aware, how
imaginative one is can only be gauged relatively and is an inexact science. I
can’t think of a standard by which to measure one’s imagination. For example, while
half our thoughts may be good and half may be bad, what would it mean for half
our thoughts to be [un]imaginative? But if there were a standard, then given
that God has ultimately determined everyone’s imagination, clearly He, the
Creator of all things, would be it. He is the most imaginative person there is:
He knows what is possible for us to think and imagine because He has determined
our thoughts and imaginations.
Sometimes, requiring the exercise of our imagination can
get across a truth more poignantly than does the usual literal statement of it.
Consider parables. Are these stories “based on a series true events”? Have they
literally occurred in the actual world? Well, these sorts of questions really miss
the point of a parable. The point is not for those who hear it to woodenly
understand random literal events. Rather, by imagining the narrated scenario, each
parable is able to communicate a spiritual truth or truths for which the story
primarily functions as a metaphor. Even if the parables are fictitious, they can
still tell us something we can and should use as motivation for obeying God’s
word. That’s what important.
Is it far-fetched to suppose that God could
relate to us truths by counter-factual conditionals which, in fact, could not
have occurred? I don’t think so. Further, if I want to lead a person or persons to make certain choices, hyperbole can be an effective stimulant to action. It engages the imagination and occasions proper
motivation. The upshot of this is would be that as a necessitarian, I would not
necessarily have to account for multiple possible worlds. So perhaps I’m
biased. In any case, a critical reader will point out that it is possible parables
could [have] occur[red].
But it is fairly routinely argued that passages which warn churches
of apostasy are purely hypothetical: final apostasy can’t actually occur in sincere
believers. Of course, the unfortunate fact is that churches are often not
composed of believers alone; nevertheless, warnings can have a significant
impact on actual believers too, reminding them to make their calling and
election sure. We can imagine what would be the case if we were to fall away
even though we can’t fall away. How? Because we know there are two categories
of sinners – believers and unbelievers – and we know what actually will accordingly
happen to both.
By abstraction, we can imagine a
character in a novel plucked from one story and implanted in another as well as what would occur on that basis. And as novelists, we can even invest our own created characters with such imaginations, with acute “self-awareness” of themselves in the context of their status as a character. But in a significant sense, we too are characters – in a divine drama.
2 comments:
Have you seen the recent Triablogue article about us?
Yes. I am still considering whether or how to respond.
Post a Comment